56 Posts in 27 Topics by 32 members
Jump to:If this is your first visit, you will need to register before you can post. However, you can browse all messages below.
| Page: 1 | go to end | Reply | |
| Author | Topic: Module Forum 0.1.2 needs MYSQL5 | 813 views |

21 March 2008 at 11:37pm
I did an Update from Forum 0.1.1 to the newer version.
I get Errors on MYSQL 4.1.22
that tell something abot 'invalid GROUP statements'.
The requiremnets for Silverstripe say MYSQL 4.1
so there should be no MYSQL5 specific code i think...
I didn't look at the details much more, am a novice in silverstripe.
maybe someone can check this?
BTW: would be fine to have seperate forums to discuss about things concerning
modules or themes.
Try to find something with a query about 'forum', and you see what i mean
*g
Helmut
Last edited: 21 March 2008 at 11:40pm

29 March 2008 at 4:27pm
modules don't necessarily need to have matching requirements to the core, in the end its just a missing "minimum requirements" note for the forum module.
good point with your search for a "forum" keyword, this would be more efficient when limited to a specific "modules" forum - although we're trying to avoid a too fragmented forum structure. what do other people think?

7 May 2008 at 2:00am
I think sections would be a lot easier to search as well. So hard to find information at the moment.

7 May 2008 at 2:27am
YEAH, to find something in Silverstripe forums
is sometimes hard.
Would be fine if there was only ONE result shown for a 'thread' if one post of the thread meets the query. and not any post of the thread, that meets the search criteria...
BTW: if anyone is interested:
I did a replacement of Forum.php function Topics()
with 'the old version' of this function and things are ok for now.
Last edited: 7 May 2008 at 2:30am

7 May 2008 at 10:02am
hey zyko - great to hear you made this functionality mysql4 compatible - can you provide your changes as a patch? http://open.silverstripe.com/#Submittingpatches
cheers

7 May 2008 at 7:37pm
Hi Ingo,
Sorry to say, i only did a 'switch-back' to old functionality.
this is no 'patch'.
this means, patching with this code, would lead to
loosing the new abilitys, the new forum version has...
g
Helmut
Last edited: 7 May 2008 at 7:37pm
| 813 views | |||
| go to top | Reply |